Anticoagulants (oral) Overview
Risk of thromboembolism
Perioperative anticoagulation decision-making should take into account the patient’s underlying thrombotic risk (see below). Risk of thrombosis should be balanced against urgency of surgery; non-urgent surgery should be delayed where possible in acute situations where thrombosis risk will improve (e.g. patients with recent CVA or VTE). A Haematologist should be consulted for complex VTE patients.
Thromboembolic risk stratification
Indication | High Thromboembolism Risk | Moderate Thromboembolism Risk | Low Thromboembolism Risk |
---|---|---|---|
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Stroke or TIA within 3 months CHA2DS2VASC 7 or more Rheumatic valvular disease | CHA2DS2VASC 5 - 6 Stroke or TIA more than 3 months prior | CHA2DS2VASC 0 - 4 (and no history of stroke / TIA) |
Metallic heart valve* | Mitral valve prosthesis Cage-ball or tilting disc (aortic or mitral) Stroke or TIA within 3 months | Bileaflet aortic valve with major risk factors for strokea | Bileaflet aortic valve with no other risk factors for stroke |
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) | VTE within 3 months Severe thrombophiliab VTE with INR target of 3.5 Active cancer associated with high VTE riskc | Recurrent VTE VTE 3 - 12 months prior Non-severe thrombophiliad Active cancer or recent history of cancer (i.e. 6 months prior) | VTE more than 12 months prior |
* All DOACs are currently contraindicated for patients with a metallic heart valve
aMultiple prior strokes, prior perioperative stroke, prior valve thrombosis
bAntiphospholipid syndrome, deficiency of protein C, protein S, or Antithrombin, multiple thrombophilia
cPacreatic cancer, myeloproliferative disorders, primary brain cancer, gastric cancer, oesophageal cancer
dHeterozygous for Factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene mutation
Risk of bleeding
The information below outlines the bleeding risk of common procedures including those where anticoagulation therapy may not have to be interrupted. This is intended as a guide rather than a comprehensive list of the bleeding risk for all operations. The operating surgeon best defines the exact bleeding risk of the procedure and, if necessary, should be consulted to confirm the need for anticoagulant interruption.
Minor bleeding risk
Minor risk interventions (bleeding infrequent and low clinical impact)* |
---|
Dental surgery (e.g. simple 1 - 3 extraction, abscess incision) |
Cataract or glaucoma intervention |
Minor dermatologic procedures (e.g. excision of basal or squamous cell cancers) |
Superficial surgery (e.g. abscess excision, simple skin biopsy) |
Pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation |
*It is often possible to perform low bleeding risk procedures without interrupting anticoagulation therapy. This will be dependent on the INR for warfarin and ensuring prudent timing of the procedure in relation to DOAC administration time (see individual drug records for further advice)
Low / moderate bleeding risk
Low / moderate risk interventions (bleeding infrequent or non-severe clinical impact) |
---|
Complex dental procedures |
Prostate or bladder biopsy |
Small orthopaedic surgery (foot, hand, arthroscopy) |
Abdominal hernia repair |
Haemorrhoid surgery |
Abdominal hysterectomy |
High bleeding risk
High risk interventions (bleeding frequent and / or of important clinical impact) |
---|
Cardiac surgery |
Cancer surgery (especially solid tumour resection) |
Spinal or epidural anaesthesia; lumbar diagnostic puncture |
Thoracic surgery |
Abdominal surgery (including liver biopsy) |
Major orthopaedic surgery |
Major urologic surgery / biopsy (including kidney) |
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy |
Peripheral arterial revascularisation surgery (e.g., aortic aneurysm repair, vascular bypass) |
Neurosurgery |
Reconstructive plastic surgery |
Bridging therapy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)
DOACs
Bridging with therapeutic LMWH is not required for patients on a DOAC. The predictable pharmacokinetics of DOACs allows for properly timed short-term cessation of DOAC therapy prior to surgery. In addition, bridging with heparin/LMWH is associated with an increased bleeding risk without reducing cardiovascular events.
Use of prophylactic doses of LMWH may be considered post-operatively if the patient is unable to recommence the DOAC within 24 hours of surgery due to the potential risk of bleeding associated with the surgery/procedure or inability to take oral therapy. Commencement of prophylactic doses of LMWH should be based on the patient’s thromboembolic risk versus the associated bleeding risk (as detailed above). LMWH should never be administered in conjunction with DOAC therapy.
Warfarin
Bridging with therapeutic LMWH may be required for patients on warfarin. The decision to use bridging therapy should be based on the patient’s thromboembolic risk and the associated bleeding risk (as detailed above) – see warfarin drug record for details of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology’s recommendations.
Use of prophylactic doses of LWMH should be considered if the patient is unable to recommence warfarin in the immediate post-operative period (e.g. due to concerns around post-operative bleeding or oral absorption).
In some cases, patients may require post-operative bridging therapy with therapeutic LMWH until they are able to safely recommence their warfarin.
References
Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS et al. European Society of Cardiology. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal. 2018; 39:1330-1393